Topic Closed|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
| <Mark Goodwin>
|
Reply to post by Mark Goodwin, on August 26, 2001 at 23:05:35:
|
||
|
| <JPS>
|
Reply to post by Mark Goodwin, on August 26, 2001 at 23:05:35:
I knew that there were recognized regional var's in the species. Here is a .gov page on this. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/pinponp/introductory.html Here is a search on a fascinating conifers database caled Gymnosperm Database. http://www.conifers.org/index.htm If the search i did does not come up, seach the word ponderosa. |
||
|
| <Mark Goodwin>
|
Reply to post by jps, on October 01, 2001 at 15:07:52:
I, too, knew of regional variants, but not of any intentional hybrids for reforestation. Even so, the fellow I mentioned before clearly stated that the trees were hybridized with a type of white pine, not yellow pine. |
||
|
| <Philip A Bjorkman>
|
Reply to post by Mark Goodwin, on August 26, 2001 at 23:05:35:
As a CA Registered Professional Forester who has worked in the central Sierra Nevada Mountains including the Paradise area, I can tell you that there is no such hybrid. You can check with the USDA Forest Service Forest Genetics Laboratory in Placerville CA to get it from "the horses mouth". The scientists (geneticists) there will know for sure. Phil |
||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed© 1997-2003 Tree Tech Consulting. All messages are the property of the original author.
