Tree Tech Consulting    The Knothole  Hop To Forum Categories  Ask the Experts    red oak vs live oak

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
<Sally Amabile>
Posted
Help, I am planning on having a 4" Red Oak planted in my yard. My husband thinks I should have a Live Oak because they don't lose their leaves. Could you tell me pros and cons of both trees? Thank you, SA, Grandview, Tx
 
Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<James Tuttle>
Posted
Reply to post by Sally Amabile, on May 01, 2000 at 15:07:00:

Sally, Regardless of kind, if you haven't planted the 4" tree yet, I recommend that you wait until the dormant season. Placement of the tree may depend on the selection or selection may depend on placement. For example, I wouldn't want a Live Oak on the south side of the house shading a picture window all winter long.
I'm not sure of the terrain of Grandview, but if it rocky limestone as I suspect, I would certainly go with a Texas Red Oak or possibly a Shumard Red Oak but not a Southern Red Oak. As to Live Oaks, I would absolutely want the Escarpment Live Oak.
For identification and selection of trees in your area, I recommend A Field Guide to Texas Trees by the late Benny Simpson.
As a side note, when you select your new tree, select one with branches that have a good angle of branch attachment. Also red oaks are particularly sensitive to being planted at the right depth. James
 
Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Closed Topic Closed

Tree Tech Consulting    The Knothole  Hop To Forum Categories  Ask the Experts    red oak vs live oak

© 1997-2003 Tree Tech Consulting. All messages are the property of the original author.