Topic Closed|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
| <Ed Milhous>
|
Reply to post by Peter Torres, on January 19, 1999 at 01:51:04:
Certainly we should leave dead/dying trees in wooded areas whenever possible! The habitat value is outstanding... and irreplaceable. I have been doing this since the 1970's and recommend it often in development inventories and on HOA's properties. Some people think it's a crazy thing to do; others love it. Heard some arborists in England (at ISA conf) who re-erect trees that have fallen and secure them to other trees. They also cut longitudinal sections from trees, create cavities, and resecure the sawn-out piece to complete the cavity. "Cleaning-up" the woods, as a general practice, has got to be a mistake! Who said, "A dead tree is more alive than a live tree." |
||
|
| <John S>
|
Reply to post by Ed Milhous, on January 19, 1999 at 01:51:04:
What about the broodtree issue? |
||
|
| <Ed Milhous>
|
Reply to post by John S, on January 19, 1999 at 21:48:41:
Obviously there are situations that would preclude leaving debris. An elm treated with cacadylic acid, or with the bark stripped off would be okay, though. (Our elms are mostly gone... it's a moot point!) |
||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed© 1997-2003 Tree Tech Consulting. All messages are the property of the original author.
